Outline+of+Written+Report+I

Written Report Outline Introduction What we have initially, what we’re going to learn, approach method - State the problem - Questions addressed - Given solutions - Breakdown problems o Research given solutions o Evaluate current methods (other than given) § Statistics § Methods § Costs o Demography o Future/upcoming methods - Method of approach o Goals - General conclusion
 * evaluate current screening methods of pancreatic cancer and recommend future screening strategies that are superior in sensitivity without sacrificing specificity of CA19-9**
 * difficulties in pancreatic cancer screening--what are they? what are alternative current screening methods? what population can be considered high-risk? sensitivity vs. specificity? what methods could be used in the future?**
 * CA19-9 is a current solution however not effective. What it is.**
 * o problems of ineffectiveness**
 * CA19-9, PET, CT, MRI, EUS, EUS/FNA, ERCP, CA494, DR70, biopsy, MRCP, US**
 * Combining methods proves most effective. EUS/FNA and CA494 paired with DR-70 were the best methods based on cost, sensitivity, invasiveness, complications, and specificity.**
 * which was most expensive, which was least.**
 * Identified a demographic at higher risk**
 * PAM4, spyglass,**
 * From this data, we recommend that a demographic identified to be at higher-risk for pancreatic cancer should be screened with DR-70 and CA494 biomarkers starting at 50+ and modify frequency of tests depending on high-risk individuals.**

Methodology - How we approached - Research based o Journal article (Data Base) - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Research analysis Statistical Calculations <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';"> Data - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">What we found - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Chart from Ppt - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Demographics - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Statistics - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Discussion of data
 * Researched medical terminology, current pancreatic cancer screening methods, developing pancreatic cancer screening methods, function, anatomy, and exact location of pancreas.**
 * Large sample size, peer-reviewed journals, impact number**
 * Compared and contrasted different methods based on cost, specificity, sensitivity, invasiveness, dangers. Made decision based on cost/person.**

Solution - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">State solution - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Success/Failure (Limitations) - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Improvements

Conclusion - <span style="font-family: 'Georgia','serif';">Restatement